G.L. c. 90, Sec. 22(a) grants the Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles broad power to indefinitely revoke a driver’s license for violations of the motor vehicle laws which constitute an immediate threat to the public safety. A revocation under the immediate threat law has been determined not to constitute a punishment and, therefore, a criminal prosecutions and non-punitive immediate threat suspension arising out of the same incident, such as an operating under the influence event, does not violate the double jeopardy clause of the United States Constitution or Massachusetts common, statutory, or constitutional law.
These indefinite license revocations are usually triggered by a police officer filing a report with the RMV wherein he explains why allowing the driver to remain on the road constitutes an immediate threat to public safety. Sometimes the issue is medical related such as a case where a person is operating under the influence of prescription medication. In other cases, the report is generated as a result of dangerous or reckless driving witnessed by or reported to a police officer. Immediate threat reports may involve companion criminal charges.
The legal standard for an indefinite immediate threat revocation, which the Registry had wide latitude in interpreting, is that the driver “has committed a violation of the motor vehicle laws of a nature which would give the Registrar reason to believe that continuing operation by such holder is and will be so seriously improper as to constitute an immediate threat to the public safety.”
The immediate threat statute requires that the Registrar find that a license holder poses such a significant threat to public safety, that the license should be summarily taken. Additionally, law requires that the Registrar provide the operator with a notice specifying the time and place of the violation or incident that led to the immediate threat suspension.
Anyone who is had his or her license or right to operate revoked as an immediate threat is entitled to a hearing at the Registry of Motor Vehicles within 30 days of the revocation and the driver is entitled to be represented by a lawyer. Massachusetts Immediate threat revocations are indefinite in nature, meaning that the revocation will not terminate unless and until the license holder has proven to the Registry’s satisfaction that the causes of the past or present violations or issues of concern have been brought under control such that the driver no longer poses a threat to the motoring public. A Registry of Motor Vehicles lawyer can help you make this showing and get your license reinstated. The RMV charges a $500.00 reinstatement fee for immediate threat suspensions.…
Student parliament is an organization, be it political, neutral or simply cultural, it has to be some structure. The agenda of the forum needs to be well maintained and the forum should run on certain impersonal rules and regulations. The basic feature describes its basic nature, its prime moots, and its mission and the organizational structure and details to run these pre-fixed notions in planned and meticulous way.
The feature of student parliament may differ from one association to another however the basic similarities like the process of election, the activity schedule, and the membership criteria remain same regardless of country, community, and nature of the parliament etc.
Students 'parliament is basically a students' organization there before students should have the power of management of the organization with them although it is expected that there should be under some core committee who can monitor the activities and day to day agenda of the said organization with Close details. One of the basic features is its organizational structure; Although it is named as parliament but it acts more as a coordinated forum for the well being of students.
One of the basic features of student's parliament is its democratic approach. The forum should have made the access for the members to express, exchange, and extend their views for betterment and multifaceted analysis of an issue in order to find better solution and better approach for the ventilation of decisions about the issue to other members. The right to express opinions and points of views can make a dynamic, and perfectly contemporary in its over-all approach.
Student parliament should have basic principle to coordinate with seniors as well as teaching children about ventilation or demonstration their opinion against any issue. It is expected that students will use their energy, will power, and organizational skill in order to induce better changes in policies or rules of administration not to show obstinacy and stubbornness for short -term success and power play of political systems. It is expected that a should have some code of conduct for implementation of these issues.
Student parliament should work as a bridge between teaching body and common students. The student can place their problems not to harass or criticize the seniors or teachers but to seek assistance to resolve any controversies with a proper manner and rational humble approach.
The unity and mutual respect should be the basic approach of an ideal student parliament. It is always expected that student should approach an issue to open eyes and with open mind and should be ready to learn the pros and cons of all practical issues in order to understand their social and personal responsibility etc. …