Pure Bottled Water Clubs in the Federal Government

Generally speaking, the Federal Government does not purchase pure bottled drinking water for Federal employees unless it can be proved that agency drinking water is unsuitable for drinking.

Proof of water quality however, is a long and time consuming process and many agency employees are forced to drink low quality, bad tasting tap or well water in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area.

Nevertheless, many Federal agency employees now purchase pure drinking water by forming water clubs. Water clubs are formed from individual employees with shared interests of maintaining good health and drinking pure water as a start. The club that is formed agrees to purchase bottled water delivery and usually agrees to rent or buy one or more water coolers for club use on the agency premises.

The club gains purchasing power based on the strength of it membership and the members gain the advantage of pure drinking water for office and event consumption. Office consumption usually takes the form of regular delivery of 5 gallon bottles for water cooler use and 20 oz and 12 oz. small package PET bottles for events or other club occasions.

Some Bottled Water Companies Offer Specific Programs Tailored To Water Clubs.

In Northern Virginia and the Washington, D.C. metro area at least one purified bottled water company offers programs tailored to water clubs in the Federal Government. These program offer volume discounts and flexible delivery dates as well as responsive customer service based upon the latest technology and trained staff.

In addition the quality of the drinking water is important. Some bottled water companies merely repackage tap water while other bottled water companies use water from springs or artesian wells that may contain contamination, harmful minerals or bacteria.

What to Look For In a Bottled Water Supplier.

If you are forming a water club in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area it is wise to conduct some due diligence before you choose a water supplier. What to look for:

  • A supplier with the highest quality water. Distilled/oxygenated water is considered by many experts to be the purest water.
  • A supplier with flexible programs that address the needs of water clubs including:

o Volume pricing agreements

o No cancellation charges

o Quality bottles with no spill caps and handles for easy use

o Flexible and changeable delivery schedules

o Flexible billing procedures

  • A supplier with trained customer service personnel and a culture of customer service.

Water clubs are becoming more common for Federal Government employees as a way to avoid the low quality tap water found in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area and it is important to choose a quality supplier that will meet the needs of the water club.

Source Article

Homeschooling Special Needs – Is Federal Help Available?

Is the homeschooling child with special needs entitled to federal educational assistance? This is an important question for parents with homeschooling special needs children or children who may not yet have complete mastery of the English language and parents need assistance in teaching such children a new language.

Under the No Child Left Behind legislation, Congress provided funds to assist public schools to meet the special needs of their students. There are monies available for a host of services, staff, and equipment. But are these benefits provided to parents of home schools? The answer depends on the law of the parents’ state. This is because the U.S. Department of Education recognizes that education is a state and local matter and it leaves it up to the states to define the status of schools. Thus, the U.S. Department of Education will provide assistance to home schools only in those states which define home schools as private schools. An example is the State of Illinois in which there is no specific legislation governing home schools. Home schools in Illinois are considered private schools as the result of a state appellate court decision. Thus, in Illinois home schools would be eligible for some financial assistance from the federal government.

This assistance could be for a special needs child who requires some form of equipment to accommodate her educational needs or funds for tutors and other types of consultants or experts. Assistance can also come in the form of monies needed to assist a student achieve English proficiency. For further information, interested parents should contact the Office of Non-Public Education within the U.S. Department of Education.

A word of caution. Federal funds always come with strings attached. Parents should consult with a competent attorney or education specialist before applying for any type of federal funds. Notwithstanding this caution, it is encouraging to note that there are resources available for the homeschooling special needs child.

Source Article

The Fight to Fix Federal Debt

Our national debt has hit an all time high at $ 14.3 trillion, an amount that can no longer be ignored. Every year, Congress spends more money than they money brought in as income, which leads to a deficit in our national budget. To cover expenses and the spending habits of Congress, money is borrowed and the total national debt is increased. To make matters worse, as the national debt increases the interest on the borrowed money begins adding to the total debt balance, pushing the nation further into financial hardship.

Each day, members of different political parties are lining up to fight for their proposed plan to manage the national debt. Republicans blame overspending on social programs such as Medicare and Social Security, while Democrats believe that under-taxation is to blame for the nation's financial woes. It's clear that Republicans and Democrats don't agree on the best long-term strategy for alleviating the national debt, but members of both parties are apprehensive about raising the debt ceiling. Despite clear party lines, problems with taxation and federal spending are issues both sides are working to resolve. The economy will suffer greatly if no agreement can be reached about how to increase the federal income and how to balance the federal budget. Continuing on the current financial path is not an option that either political party is considering.

Can we fix it?

Regardless of which side of the political spectrum you stand on, some of the proposed ideas could leave all Americans paying for more and getting less in return. The idea of ​​a National Sales Tax, has people of all income brackets fuming. The economy is fueled by consumer spending, so how would a "tax on consumption" be beneficial? The national debt may reduce slightly, over long periods of time, but consumer spending would slow and the number of people who need to receive government assistance for essential items may increase as a result. This idea appears to be a double-edged sword. Along the same lines, eliminating or capping deductions for donations to charities may backfire and result in fewer contributions and an increased need for funding from the government. Reducing benefits for veterans or Social Security benefits may appear as viable options, but how will our respected elders pay for essential living items, and possibly the added national sales tax, when they earn so little each month?

The national debt is a government problem, brought about by years of inadequate budgeting and overspending. It is unreasonable to assume that the debt crisis can be fixed by imposing more restrictions and additional requirements to the citizens of America. It is also unlikely that without such measures, our national debt will be reduced to a manageable state. The compromise may be found in some realistic cut-backs and sensible added requirements we, as a nation, can overcome this financial collapse into debt.

Source Article

Is the Entire Federal Acquisition Regulation Incorporated In Your Contract?

The Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) is found in Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations. It consists of 37 Chapters (Chapter 1, some 2,000+ pages, which applies to all agencies, and then various agency supplements plus the Cost Accounting Standards). In all, the FAR is thousands of pages long. Are all of the relevant parts of the FAR incorporated into your government contract? The simple answer is “NO,” but first a bit of background.

A recent Court of Federal Claims Case, James M. Fogg Farms, Inc. v. United States, No. 17-188C (Fed. Cl. Sept. 27, 2017), considered a similar issue. The question in Fogg was whether federal statutes (specifically, an Agriculture Conservation Program in the Farm Bill, title 16 of the U.S. Code) was incorporated in their contract with the Department of Agriculture for that specific program, and whether the government had breached that term in the law. The Court held that there was no specific term in their contract that gave rise to Fogg’s claim of breach, and ruled against Fogg. The Court further explained that it is “reluctant to find that statutory or regulatory provisions are incorporated into a contract with the government unless the contract explicitly provides for their incorporation,” citing St. Christopher Assocs., LP v. United States, 511 F. 3d 1376, 1384 (Fed. Cir. 2008), further citing Smithson v. United States, 847 F. 2d 791, 794 (Fed. Cir. 1988). Both of the two Federal Circuit cases make it clear that wholesale incorporation of regulations into a contract could allow a contracting party to choose among many regulations as to a particular cause of action, rather than the specific requirements in the actual contract.

So exactly what is the FAR, and when is it (or part of it) incorporated into a government contract. FAR 1.101 says that

The Federal Acquisition Regulations system is established for the codification and publication of uniform policies and procedures for acquisition by all executive agencies. The Federal Acquisition Regulations System consists of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), which is the primary document, and agency acquisition regulations that implement or supplement the FAR.

FAR 2.101 also states that “Acquisition” means the acquiring by contract with appropriated funds of supplies or services (including construction) by and for the use of the Federal Government through purchase or lease, whether the supplies or services are already in existence or must be created, developed, demonstrated and evaluated.

You may search high and low in the FAR, but you will find nothing that states that the FAR is incorporated into government contracts as a whole. See Edwards & Nash, “The FAR: Does It Have Contractual Force and Effect?” 31 Nash & Cibinic Report NL ¶10 (Feb. 2017). The Court cases (and this Edwards and Nash article) make it clear that in order for a specific FAR sentence or section to be included in your contract, the contract must explicitly so state or be incorporated by reference.

There are certain clauses that incorporate a FAR section by reference. …

Voter Approved Medical Dispensary – States And Federal Law

US Medical Marijuana Card

In the United States, there are currently 16 Legal Medical Marijuana States and District of Columbia that currently have laws that have legalized marijuana for medicinal purposes.

The states are:

Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, DC, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.

You may acquire a Marijuana Card only if you suffer from a medical condition as prescribed by a doctor.

Although many states have approved medical marijuana as an alternative form of medication for many ailments, the United States Government is still in opposition of the state laws regarding voter approved marijuana.

For example, in a well written article, there is reason to believe that those marijuana patients in the states that currently allow marijuana use for medicinal purposes are in jeopardy of losing their Second Amendment Rights.

Second Amendment Rights are The Right To Bear Arms as a US citizen.

According to the article, The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms (ATF) says that a patient gives up his or her constitutional right just by letting the state know that they want to take medical marijuana.

The article also points out that medical marijuana users have diminished rights just by having a marijuana card.

Here's how the ATF sees it:

If you are a medical marijuana patient, you are in violation of federal code Sect. 922 (g) of the federal Gun Control Act, which basically says that anyone "who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance" is basically barred from possessing or receiving guns or ammo.

The article is worth reading, which I highly recommend … and most importantly, if you are going to apply for a medical marijuana card, it's best to know all of your rights and options.

Read the full article here .

In addition to the marijuana patients possibility losing their Second Amendment rights, there have been a serious assault by California federal prosecutors against marijuana dispensaries throughout the state; the Feds are threatening to shut down dispensaries and sending letters out to landlords warning them about the sales of the drug on their premises.

In the letter, it warns the landlord that they must comply within 45 days in order to avoid the possibility that their property will be seized and they will be sent to prison.

What is your opinion regarding this controversial debate? Let your voice be heard at the polls.

Source Article

Federal Resume Writing Services Cuts Through the Red Tape

Writing a federal resume and completing a federal job application packet are not jobs for the inexperienced or faint of heart. Successfully cutting through the red tape that usually surrounds federal job requirements requires skill, determination and experience.

A powerful resume written by federal resume specialists gives you a big advantage over your competitors. Remember, every day literally hundreds of thousands of people apply for only thousands of federal jobs. If your resume and application package are less than stellar, you won’t stand a chance!

A great federal resume cuts through the red tape by emphasizing your academic achievements, education, transferable skills and career-matching qualifications by providing most if not all of the following information about you:

Your Knowledge, Skills and Abilities (KSAs): The federal government frequently requires a supplemental narrative statement that addresses a specific knowledge, skills, and abilities as they pertain to a job series or position. Providing quantitative or qualitative evidence that supports your KSAs is imperative. All KSAs are scored on a point system, and specific examples usually get the highest scores.

KSAs are also known as: Supplemental Narrative Statements, Selective Factors, Selective Placement Factors, Evaluation Criteria, Executive Core Qualifications, and Professional and Technical Qualifications.

See why you need a specialist?

Here are the basic definitions for KSA statements:

Knowledge statements are bodies of organized factual and procedural information that indicate your performance on the job will be adequate.

Skill statements mean how well you manually, verbally or mentally manipulate the data or other things as required by the job for which you are applying, for example typing tests or vehicle-operating skills, or skills in writing and editing and evaluating information.

Ability statements describe your present abilities to perform an observable activity, as opposed to whatever aptitudes you possess. Aptitudes are only the potential for performing the activity.

KSA’s are important because Office of Personnel Management ranks applicants with higher proficiency levels on a quality ranking factor above those with lower proficiency levels With quality ranking factors, the focus is on the level of proficiency the candidate brings to the job.” Simply put, KSAs alone will not disqualify you but they are essential to receiving a high proficiency rating.

KSA’s are only one of many reasons why hiring a professional federal resume service is the smartest move you can make when applying for a federal job. So don’t leave your federal hiring to chance–to increase your chances of being hired for a federal job, put your chances in the hands of professional today.

Source Article

Federal Bank US Vs RBI

Now the question here is, if England was present in the US and ruled India for around 100 years, how did we escape the Private Central Reserve and have a government Reserve Bank which we proudly call as the Reserve Bank of India.

This revolution happened because a guy submitted his PhD thesis to the chief economist of the UK at that time with title of his thesis as Problem of the Rupee, the Problem and Resolution and the name of this person is Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar.

The Reserve Bank of India was established on the basis of the resolution points given by Dr. Ambedkar in his PhD thesis.

Most of the European countries now are in economic troubles because of their banking system. Banks lending out money to people who cannot repay. In this process the Bank earns the profit that they don’t care if the country falls in economic crises.

The Reserve Bank of India was founded on 1 April 1935 to respond to economic troubles after the First World War. RBI was conceptualized as per the guidelines, working style and outlook presented by Dr. B R Ambedkar as written in his book “The Problem of the Rupee – Its origin and its solution.” in front of the Hilton Young Commission. The bank was set up based on the recommendations of the 1926 Royal Commission on Indian Currency and Finance, also known as the Hilton-Young Commission”

The Fed considers the Federal Reserve System “an independent central bank because its monetary policy decisions do not have to be approved by the President or anyone else in the executive or legislative branches of government, it does not receive funding appropriated by the Congress, and the terms of the members of the Board of Governors span multiple presidential and congressional terms.”

It clearly says that the Federal Reserve has nothing to do with the US Govt. and Legislation. Its operations are completely independent and they do not have to ask anyone if they wish to change the operational policy. If they wish they can stop lending loans to the US Govt. anytime without giving any explanations to anyone.

“The general superintendence and direction of the RBI is entrusted with the 21-member Central Board of Directors: the Governor (Dr. Raghuram Rajan), 4 Deputy Governors, 2 Finance Ministry representatives, 10 government-nominated directors to represent important elements from India’s economy, and 4 directors to represent local boards headquartered at Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai and New Delhi.”

The Board of directors includes a strategist, called as Governor and the FINANCE MINISTRY. There is no private stakeholder of the RBI and it operates with the aim of the economic development of the country. The sole aim of the Federal Reserve is making profit for the private stakeholders where’s the aim of the RBI is the economic development of the nation and not profit.

I have no idea about all the resolution points given by him, but the formation a central Govt. Reserve (RBI) to control the …

Playing from the Blue Tees: Women in the Federal Government

Throughout the past decade, workplace diversity issues have allowed organizations to adjust their policies in response to the need for workplace equality in all aspects. As a result of the dynamic political, social and economic changes, some companies have willingly become more inclusive, integrating women, people of color, gays/lesbians, and individuals with disabilities into their workforce at all levels of their organizations. However, others have failed to make this paradigm shift.

The Federal government has failed to see the benefits of a diverse workforce, which is evident by the lack of diversity of the people it serves. Research by the Center for Creative Leadership (2002), show women in business have been required to adapt to a well established hierarchal system built around the strengths of its majority of male players. As women have entered the workplace, they initially try to create only a modest variant in a male dominated workplace. Gender diversity could be very beneficial to the Federal government, causing greater creativity in group decision-making and improved task performance.

Leadership is usually considered to be predominantly a male prerogative in corporate, political, military, and other sectors of our society. This might explain why, although women have gained increased access to supervisory and middle management positions, they remain underrepresented in leadership positions. Throughout history, women have been contributors to society, helped shaped America, and exercised their power and their abilities through various interests. But the recognition as leaders is still slow to come.

Women are still confronted by an invisible barrier preventing their rise into leadership ranks the “glass ceiling.” However, studies indicate that women are inching through the glass ceiling that has prevented them from attaining leadership positions. When we look at the surveys and research, women seem to have progressed in the last couple of years in terms of management positions. The caveat however is, women who achieve these positions are usually placed under closer scrutiny and their evaluation is not always positive. While studies propose that women are likely to receive positive evaluations when their leadership roles are defined in feminine terms, on traditional, masculine measures of leadership, women’s leadership is often perceived to be lower than their male counterparts.

Some women have developed strategies for overcoming workplace barriers to career advancement and achieved senior positions. While these barriers do not restrict the careers of all women that they impact, a significant number is evident from the poor representation of women at senior levels. The limited number of women reaching the highest positions in the government indicates that further attention to overcoming these barriers in the future is necessary.

Source Article

Standardization, Uncertainty and Our Federal Government Regulators

Our Federal Government should stay out of regulations that purposely and adversely affect one competitor in industry for the benefit of another – unfortunately with our lobbyists in Washington DC, that's just not what happens. We need standardization for our civilization, but must be very careful how we legislate that, or determine such parameters.

All too often those closest to the power base get their way over their marketplace competition. It's free-enterprise and the consumers who lose, while one group of investors and executives get rich – then are all too willing to return the favor in campaign contributions to keep that gravy train hovering its Maglev Track to future profits.

Not long ago we were discussing this issue at our Think Tank and think tanker Andrew stated:

"The reason why I believe this is such an important issue is a very simple concept. The Federal Government is constantly flip flopping back and forth from one party to another, and it could actually be toxic for a business – absolutely a nightmare. When centralized governments flip flop back and forth, it creates uncertainty for business owners. "

True enough, still, if our Federal Government was running its business with integrity, we wouldn't have to worry about that. Today, we have too much crony-capitalism and hijacking of the political process. The Obama Administration is quite troubling in that regard, from a business person's perspective, unless you are on the inside track I suppose, then you get all the juice and your competitors get crushed, as they pick winners and losers.

Are things better at the state level? Yes and no, overall perhaps, however, some states are completely arbitrary with how they enforce the laws. So, we never sold a franchise in TX to anyone who was and Aggie! We are not stupid, we know the drill. Wait, we once did sell a franchise to a non-Aggie, but he did last long.

Perhaps the worst thing in business is uncertainty, because if you don't know what you are dealing with it's hard to allocate large amounts of capital, because you simply cannot ascertain if you can ever achieve a reasonable ROI, and the uncertainty adds to the risks, thus, lessens the potential rewards.

Having some standardization regulations help alleviate uncertainty, and all market players know what they are dealing with, as long as there is trust in the stability of those standards moving forward. Business, both small and large, and entire industries must be able to trust the government at all levels and the political apparatus – if not all bets are off. Of course this is part common sense, part warning, and part philosophy. Be Great, Don't Hesitate.

Source Article

Federal Resume Do's and Don'ts

The majority of us have at least taken a stab at writing a regular resume, but writing a federal resume is somewhat different. You can't simply follow the guidelines of writing a regular resume and expect that it will get you that government job. Nowadays, writing the resume on the government resume form is the right protocol; It is also called the OF-612 form. Here are some dos and don'ts when it comes to writing a government resume

Include contact information as requested: Be sure to include full contact information, such as your full name, mailing address and email, reinstatement eligibility if applicable and job series and dates of previous jobs as applicable.

Include educational history in chronological order: Unlike the average resume, you're going to provide your background info and qualifications in chronological rather than reverse chronological order. So, for education, you'll want to start with your high school education, and move on up from there.

List any major studied, and include the total credits earned: It might be appealing to use bullet points for these sections, but watch out; while bullet points are perfect for civilian resumes, they are less applicable in federal job applications.

Be as detailed as possible: Again, while civilian resumes focus on being brief and to the point, government job seekers are going to want to know exactly what you have done, specifically as it relates to education and experience.

List equivalent experience: There may be times when your education doesn't specifically match the qualifications needed for the job, but if you've had experience that will qualify you nonetheless, make sure you list it.

There are a few don'ts when it comes to preparing your government resume, as well.

Don't forget to include specific information as it pertains to the job you are applying to: it's possible to fill in the gaps if you don't have the required education for a specific job by detailing experience, but if specific information is required, make sure to include it.

Don't skimp: write everything with the most details possible.

Don't make the KSA a copy of the resume: Write the KSA as precisely and succinctly as possible

Source Article